Category 01
Safe Auto-Fix
Simple, low-risk corrections where the intended outcome is clear and can be verified.
Pluro explains findings, proposes remediation paths and separates low-risk corrections from work that needs review, context or expert judgment.
AI-assistedHuman-controlledA missing deterministic attribute is not the same as a heading decision, a content label or a complex interaction. Pluro classifies the recommendation so teams know what can move quickly and what must remain under human control.
Category 01
Simple, low-risk corrections where the intended outcome is clear and can be verified.
Category 02
Suggestions that require content, product, design or accessibility judgment before action.
Category 03
Complex semantic or behavioral issues that should be handled by developers or experts.
AI Insight is most useful when it reduces interpretation time without hiding uncertainty. Reviewers see the affected element, user impact, recommendation, expected outcome and confidence boundary before approving a path.
No guessing
Pluro should not invent labels, reading order or behavior where context is missing.
Human approval
Reviewers can approve, edit, reject or route a recommendation to an expert.
Decision history
The recommendation, selected path and review status stay connected to the finding.
Verification
A recommendation is not treated as successful until the original issue is checked again.
Expert escalation
Behavior, design and meaning decisions are routed to the right professional.
No compliance promise
It accelerates work but does not replace comprehensive testing or professional judgment.
See how Pluro moves from finding to explanation, recommendation, human decision and verification.